Wait Times for Cancer Surgery| Description of Indicator | Percent of cancer surgery patients whose surgical consult occurs within priority access target for Wait 1 Priority 2 = 10 Days Priority 3 = 21 Days Priority 4 = 35 Days |
|---|
| Figures/Graphs | Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 |
|---|
| Rationale for Measurement | Ontario Wait Time Strategy has identified Wait 1 as a critical component of the surgical patient wait time journey in order to provide a more complete and transparent measure of access to surgery |
|---|
| Evidence/References for Rationale | Articles Boyd, K.U., et al. (2010). Factors Affecting Surgical Wait Times for Breast Reconstruction, Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 18(3): 107-111 Farrell, S. (2008). Statement on Wait Times in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 204: Gaudet, M., et al. (2007) The Wait for Total Hip Replacement in Patients with Osteoarthritis, Canadian Journal of Surgery, 52(2) 101-109 Glynn, P.A.R., et al. (2003). The Saskatchewan Surgical Care Network- Toward Timely and Appropriate Access. Hospital Quarterly, 7(1) 44-48 Hurlbert, J., Mobbs, R., Teo, Charles. (2008). Access to Spine Care: A Tale of Two Cities. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 30(3): 248-257 Milliken, D., et al. (2006). Waiting Too Long: Reducing and Better Managing Wait Times in BC. British Columbia Medical Association, 1-26 Naylor, D., et al. (1995) Waiting for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Population-Based Study of 8517 Consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada, The Lancet, 356: 1605-1609 Sanmartin, C., et al. (2011). Waiting for Medical Services in Canada: Lots of Heat, But Little Light. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(9): 1305-1310 Shortt, S.E.D., Shaw, R.A. (2003). Equity in Canadian Health Care: Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Waiting Times for Elective Surgery? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(4): 413-416 Simon, D., et al. (2009). Potential Triaging of Referrals for Lumbar Spinal Surgery Consultation: A Comparison of Referral Accuracy from Pain Specialists, Findings from Advanced Imaging and a 3-Item Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 52(6): 473-480 Snider, M.G., et al. (2005). Waiting Times and Patient Perspectives for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Rural and Urban Ontario. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 48(5): 355-360 Rumble, T., Kreder, H.J. (2005). Report on Benchmarks for Wait Times. The National Standards Committee Canadian Orthopaedic Association, 1-15 Wright, J.G., Li, K., Seguin, C., Booth, M., Fitzgerald, P., Jones, S., Leitch, K. K., & Willis, B. (2011). Development of pediatric wait time access targets. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 54 (2):107-110.
Web http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/4328.asp http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/org/ahs-org-pr-performance-report.pdf http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/12/06/wait-times-fraser-institute.html http://www.ccyhc.org/work_surgical_projects.html http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Libraries/TQ2013/Mark-Wyatt-Ron-Epp-presentation.sflb.ashx https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/WaitTimesSummary2012_EN.pdf http://www.fraserinstitute.org/research-news/news/display.aspx?id= 17069 http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/waittime/index.html http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/waittime/report2006.pdf http://www.health.alberta.ca/documents/Becoming-the-Best- 2010.pdf http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2009/ Access_to_surgery_SAC_Final_Report.pdf http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/swt/overview/waittime_targets.html http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/surgical-initiative http://www.sasksurgery.ca/ http://www.sasksurgery.ca/cs-waittimes-lists.htm http://www.waittimealliance.ca/waittimes/P-CATS-Report_en.pdf http://waittimes.alberta.ca/ http://www.oecd.org/health/waitingtimepolicies.htm http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/fouryear-surgery- wait-20130602-2nk22.html#ixzz2gmM9bEpb/ http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health_ reform/national-workforcereform/national_partnership.pdf http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129 542732 http://www.nhs.uk/choiceintheNHS/Rightsandpledges/Waitingtimes/ Pages/Guide%20to%20waiting%20times.aspx http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/ Content/Expert-PanelReport#.UPyskm-yBjQ
Legislation Report to the Council of Australian Governments (2011) (Expert Panel Review of Elective Surgery and Expert Panel Review of Elective Surgery and Emergency Access Targets under the National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services) National Health Reform, Australian Government |
|---|
| Calculations for the Indicator | (Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their first consultation with a specialist within the priority access targets / Total number of cancer surgery patients with referral and consult dates) x 100 |
|---|
| Standardized Rate Calculation | N/A |
|---|
| Unit | Percentage of cancer surgery patients who had their consultation within priority access target |
|---|
| Data Sources | Wait Time Information System Ontario Cancer Registry (thyroid cancer only) |
|---|
| Time Frame | Jan-Nov 2016 |
|---|
| Geographic Scale | Provincial, LHIN of Patient Residence |
|---|
| Denominator Description | Denominator = Total number of cancer surgery patients with referral and consult dates after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria Exclusions: Individuals <18 years old Skin – carcinoma, skin – melanoma, and lymphomas Priority 1 procedures and cases with missing priority Diagnostic, palliative, and reconstructive cancer procedures Cases where there is no suspicion of cancer or known cancer Wait list entries identified by hospitals as data entry errors Operative episodes that take place outside of a fully equipped operating room Wait list entries without consult and referral dates (No Referral/Follow up cases) Inclusion: Closed (or completed) wait list entries with actual procedure dates within date range. |
|---|
| Numerator Description | Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their first consultation with a specialist within the priority access target |
|---|
| Considerations | The percent of cancer surgery patients seen by specialist within access target is weighted based on volume by wait 1 priority level. Patient Unavailable Days are deducted from patient wait times: The periods of time between the referral and consult date when the patient is unavailable for a first consultation due to patient-related reason are subtracted from the overall Wait 1. |
|---|
| Data Availability & Limitations | Guidelines are implemented to ensure the facilities submit their data through WTIS in close to real time at source. A 2-business-day rule has been put in place for opening a wait list entry in the system when the decision for treatment is made, and closing the entry after the procedure is performed. This rule is established to ensure compliance with timely data submissions. Wait 1 data is entered at the time of Decision to Treat. It is possible to allow for an audit trail back to the original source of data in the physician’s office or the hospital scheduling system. As of January 2016, the wait 1 percent completion rate metric was measured against a separate wait 1 priority level assigned to patients seeking specialist consult. |
|---|
Wait Times for Cancer Surgery| Description of Indicator | Percent of cancer surgery patients whose surgical procedure occurs within priority access targets for Wait 2 Priority 2 = 14 Days Priority 3 = 28 Days Priority 4 = 84 Days |
|---|
| Figures/Graphs | Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 |
|---|
| Rationale for Measurement | Ontario’s Wait Time Strategy was developed to improve access to five key health services by reducing wait times for cancer surgery, cardiac procedures, cataract surgery, hip and knee replacement and MRI and CT scans. |
|---|
| Evidence/References for Rationale | Articles Boyd, K.U., et al. (2010). Factors Affecting Surgical Wait Times for Breast Reconstruction, Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 18(3): 107-111 Farrell, S. (2008). Statement on Wait Times in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 204: Gaudet, M., et al. (2007) The Wait for Total Hip Replacement in Patients with Osteoarthritis, Canadian Journal of Surgery, 52(2) 101-109 Glynn, P.A.R., et al. (2003). The Saskatchewan Surgical Care Network- Toward Timely and Appropriate Access. Hospital Quarterly, 7(1) 44-48 Hurlbert, J., Mobbs, R., Teo, Charles. (2008). Access to Spine Care: A Tale of Two Cities. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 30(3): 248-257 Milliken, D., et al. (2006). Waiting Too Long: Reducing and Better Managing Wait Times in BC. British Columbia Medical Association, 1-26 Naylor, D., et al. (1995) Waiting for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Population-Based Study of 8517 Consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada, The Lancet, 356: 1605-1609 Sanmartin, C., et al. (2011). Waiting for Medical Services in Canada: Lots of Heat, But Little Light. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(9): 1305-1310 Shortt, S.E.D., Shaw, R.A. (2003). Equity in Canadian Health Care: Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Waiting Times for Elective Surgery? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(4): 413-416 Simon, D., et al. (2009). Potential Triaging of Referrals for Lumbar Spinal Surgery Consultation: A Comparison of Referral Accuracy from Pain Specialists, Findings from Advanced Imaging and a 3-Item Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 52(6): 473-480 Snider, M.G., et al. (2005). Waiting Times and Patient Perspectives for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Rural and Urban Ontario. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 48(5): 355-360 Rumble, T., Kreder, H.J. (2005). Report on Benchmarks for Wait Times. The National Standards Committee Canadian Orthopaedic Association, 1-15 Wright, J.G., Li, K., Seguin, C., Booth, M., Fitzgerald, P., Jones, S., Leitch, K. K., & Willis, B. (2011). Development of pediatric wait time access targets. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 54 (2):107-110.
Web http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/4328.asp http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/org/ahs-org-pr-performance-report.pdf http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/12/06/wait-times-fraser-institute.html http://www.ccyhc.org/work_surgical_projects.html http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Libraries/TQ2013/Mark-Wyatt-Ron-Epp-presentation.sflb.ashx https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/WaitTimesSummary2012_EN.pdf http://www.fraserinstitute.org/research-news/news/display.aspx?id= 17069 http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/waittime/index.html http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/waittime/report2006.pdf http://www.health.alberta.ca/documents/Becoming-the-Best- 2010.pdf http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2009/ Access_to_surgery_SAC_Final_Report.pdf http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/swt/overview/waittime_targets.html http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/surgical-initiative http://www.sasksurgery.ca/ http://www.sasksurgery.ca/cs-waittimes-lists.htm http://www.waittimealliance.ca/waittimes/P-CATS-Report_en.pdf http://waittimes.alberta.ca/ http://www.oecd.org/health/waitingtimepolicies.htm http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/fouryear-surgery- wait-20130602-2nk22.html#ixzz2gmM9bEpb/ http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health_ reform/national-workforcereform/national_partnership.pdf http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129 542732 http://www.nhs.uk/choiceintheNHS/Rightsandpledges/Waitingtimes/ Pages/Guide%20to%20waiting%20times.aspx http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/ Content/Expert-PanelReport#.UPyskm-yBjQ
Legislation Report to the Council of Australian Governments (2011) (Expert Panel Review of Elective Surgery and Expert Panel Review of Elective Surgery and Emergency Access Targets under the National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services) National Health Reform, Australian Government |
|---|
| Calculations for the Indicator | Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their surgical treatment from decision for surgery within the wait 2 priority access targets/ Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their surgical treatment within the reporting period) x 100% |
|---|
| Standardized Rate Calculation | N/A |
|---|
| Unit | Percent of cancer surgery patients treated within wait time priority access target |
|---|
| Data Sources | Wait Time Information System, Ontario Cancer Registry (throid cancer only) |
|---|
| Time Frame | 2008 – 2016 (Jan-Nov) |
|---|
| Geographic Scale | Provincial, LHIN of Patient Residence |
|---|
| Denominator Description | Denominator = Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their surgical treatment within the reporting period after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria Exclusions: Individuals <18 years old Skin – carcinoma, skin – melanoma, and lymphomas Priority 1 procedures and cases with missing priority Diagnostic, palliative, and reconstructive cancer procedures Cases where there is no suspicion of cancer or known cancer Wait list entries identified by hospitals as data entry errors Operative episodes that take place outside of a fully equipped operating room Inclusion: Closed (or completed) wait list entries with actual procedure dates within date range. For thyroid cancer surgery wait times, incidence cases from OCR (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015) with a valid health card number and an endocrine-classified record in WTIS were included. |
|---|
| Numerator Description | Total number of cancer surgery patients who had their surgical treatment from decision for surgery within the wait 2 priority access targets |
|---|
| Considerations | The percent of cancer surgery patients treated within access target is weighted based on volume by priority level. Patient Unavailable Days are deducted from patient wait times: The periods of time between the Decision To Treat (DTT) date and the Actual Procedure date when the patient is unavailable for the procedure due to patient-related reasons are subtracted from the overall Wait 2. |
|---|
| Data Availability & Limitations | Guidelines are implemented to ensure the facilities submit their data through WTIS in close to real time at source. A 2-business-day rule has been put in place for opening a wait list entry in the system when the decision for treatment is made, and closing the entry after the procedure is performed. This rule is established to ensure compliance with timely data submissions. Wait 1 data is entered at the time of Decision to Treat. It is possible to allow for an audit trail back to the original source of data in the physician’s office or the hospital scheduling system |
|---|
|
|